Ghana's Shariah status in the definition of Ayatollah Khamenei according to its evidence

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Doctoral student of Razavi University of Islamic Sciences and a graduate of level 3 of Khorasan Seminary, level 4 of Khorasan Seminary
2 Razavi University of Islamic Sciences
10.22034/toa.2025.2045994.1468
Abstract
The definition of the key term *ghinā* has been extensively discussed in the words of jurists, with a wide range of differing theories presented. Among these, it appears that the Supreme Leader has offered a new definition of *ghinā*, one which, upon careful examination, strengthens the possibility of its being a case of *ḥaqīqat sharʿiyya* (a legally instituted meaning in Islamic law). This is despite the fact that his words do not explicitly state such a claim. Given the significant influence of the Leader’s views within the Islamic system, clarifying the nature of this definition carries added importance.

This study, written using an analytical-descriptive method and based on library sources, seeks to answer the essential question of whether the theory of *ḥaqīqat sharʿiyya* regarding the term *ghinā* can be attributed to him. The research concludes that, through a close examination of the Supreme Leader’s approach to defining *ghinā*, and by considering the principle that *ḥaqīqat sharʿiyya* is established when a qualifier is not permanently employed alongside a term, it can be inferred that he regards the word *ghinā* as having a legally instituted meaning, relying on verse 6 of Sūrat Luqmān. The distinctive feature of his definition is the inclusion of the qualifier “that which leads astray from the path of God.”

Keywords



Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 30 November 2025