Squid Game: A Satire on Social Contract

The TV series 'Squid Game' takes an east to west perspective in an effort to clarify certain concepts that lawyers encounter, particularly criticism of the capitalist system. This type of criticism is not a new phenomenon, as many critical written works and plays have emerged in response to the global establishment of this system. However, two specific aspects within the realm of public law make this subject more intriguing. Firstly, fundamental criticism has emerged within the framework of the same capitalist system and is being presented on a global scale. This practice is uncommon among the ideologies of the 21st century, highlighting the importance of tolerance and engagement with critics and opponents. Secondly, the social contract, considered a sacred concept that forms the foundation of the modern political and legal system, has been challenged. Specifically, within the various stages of the 'Squid Game', it becomes clear that a social contract, even when formally agreed upon with consent and free will, does not necessarily guarantee any ethical or socially just content. Citizens must consciously consider the conceptual choices that encompass human rights and public liberties when accepting the social contract. It is evident that this approach will face existential and practical challenges in the future. However, the significance of defining the content to advance social justice by citizens during the acceptance of the social contract remains undiminished.