One of the main problems which have been considered during recent decades in architecture is symbolization and in general, meaning- making in architecture which depends to how understand the process of the meaning interpretation in architectural works. Due to this problem, there are some important questions in the theory field of architecture such as can we assume a final meaning for an architectural work or not or can we present a certain framework for discussing among architectural work, its architect and its audience or not? During this research and according to Islamic teachings, for responding to these questions, a new approach will be theorized which will conclude a new theory about the problem of this research which is named “text/architecture semantics based on Islamic teachings”. Preliminary purpose of the explanation of this theory is to achieve a model of artistic interpretation that is consistent with Islamic teachings to guarantee the appropriateness of the appearance and conscience in meaning-making process. Based on this model, it will be specified that during the process of interpretation of architectural works, what components are effective and basically, audience how and during which process would deduce the meanings of architectural works. It is clear that the function of this model is too important for symbolization and meaning-making in architectural works.
حسین زاده، محمد، مبانی معرفت دینی، قم، انتشارات موسسه امام خمینی، ۱۳ ۸۵ .
حسین زاده، محمد، معرفت شناسی، قم، انتشارات موسسه امام خمینی، ۱۳ ۸۱ .
حکیم، نگار، «معماری متن وار و پیشگامان آن »، مجله معمار، ش ۲۰، ۱۳ ۸۲ .
خمینی، رو حا لله، شرح چهل حدیث، تهران، موسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی، ۱۳ ۸۷ .
رئیسی، محمدمنان، «معماری ب همثابه متن: واکاوی امکان قرائت های مختلف از یک اثر معماری »، مجله منظر، ش 7، ۱۳ ۸۹ .
رئیسی، محمدمنان و عبدالحمید نقره کار، «هست یشناسی معنا در آثار معماری »، مجله هو یت شهر، ش 24 ، م آموزههای اسلا ستناد بها ا معماری ب معناشناسیِ متن/ 85۱۳۹ ۴ .
ساسانی، فرهاد، عوامل مؤثر در تفسیر و فهم متن )تفسیرگری پیوستاری(، پایا ننامه دوره دکتری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی تهران، ۱۳ ۸۱ .
سجودی، فرزان، نشانه شناسی: نظریه و عمل، تهران، نشر علم، ۱۳ ۸۸ .
Derrida, Jacques, 1987, Positions, trans.Alan Bass, London, The Athlone Press.
Eagleton, Terry,1983, Literary Theory: An Introduction, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Eco, Umberto,1979, A Theory of Semiotics, Milan, Bloomington.
Eco, Umberto, 1994, "The limits of interpretation", Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
Hirsch jr, Eric Donald, 1976, The Aims of Interpretation, University of Chicago Press.
Hirsch jr, Eric Donald, 1967, "Validity in Interpretation", New Haven, Yale University Press.
Moore, Gary, 1991, “Linking Environment-Behavior and Design Theories: Framing the Debate”, EDRA, 22.
Moore, Gary, 1997, “Toward Environment-Behavior Theories of the Middle Range in Advances in Environment, Behavior and Design”, vol.4, New York, Plenum Press.
Nietzsche, Friedrich, 1990, “Interpretation” in: G.L.Ormiston and A.D.Schrift (eds.), Transforming the Hermeneutic Context, New York, State University of New York Press.
Nietzsche, Friedrich, 1968 , The will to power, trans.Walter Kaufmann, New York, Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Rapoport, Amos, 1990, "The Meaning of the Built Environment, A Nonverbal Communication Approach", Tucson, University of Arizona Press.