Imagination as a subject of jurisprudence in performing arts

This article is organized for the purpose of explaining imagination in performing arts, as a matter of jurisprudence. If a jurist does not have a clear concept of it during ijtihad in artistic matters, including imagination in the performing arts, he cannot do jurisprudence. Since imagination is a juvenile verb, the question arises that in the jurisprudence of performing arts, how can imagination be the subject of jurisprudence? In response to the aforementioned question, this theoretical basis has been adopted that, firstly, the subject of jurisprudence is the obligatory verb, or what belongs to his verb, and secondly, the obligatory verb is both juarhi and juwanhi, and thirdly, the understanding of hidden issues, including shari'i, customary and complex lexical, which They require examination and questioning, it is the duty of the jurist. Therefore, the author has tried to explain the concept of artistic imagination and its types by using the analytical descriptive method, to clarify the limits and gaps of imagination in performing arts as a jurisprudential issue. The results of the research findings show that creative, creative and representational imagination as an optional activity, even before it appears in the performance and performance form, can be placed as a juvenile verb, the subject and object of jurisprudence.